NCGA - North Carolina General Assembly
Full Site Search:
Search Bill Text:
Find a Bill:
View Member Info:
Senate Member Vote Statistics
2017-2018 Session

District Name Total Votes Eligible Votes Actual Votes Vote % With Majority With Majority % Against Majority Against Majority %
15 Alexander (R) 235 209 209 100.0% 204 97.6% 5 2.4%
45 Ballard (R) 235 218 215 98.6% 214 99.5% 1 0.5%
18 Barefoot (R) 235 229 229 100.0% 228 99.6% 1 0.4%
17 Barringer (R) 235 207 205 99.0% 195 95.1% 10 4.9%
26 Berger (R) 235 199 199 100.0% 199 100.0% 0 0.0%
39 Bishop (R) 235 209 207 99.0% 204 98.6% 3 1.4%
14 Blue (D) 235 208 204 98.1% 154 75.5% 50 24.5%
13 Britt (R) 235 232 232 100.0% 230 99.1% 2 0.9%
34 Brock (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 231 98.3% 4 1.7%
6 Brown (R) 235 233 233 100.0% 230 98.7% 3 1.3%
4 Bryant (D) 235 231 230 99.6% 180 78.3% 50 21.7%
16 Chaudhuri (D) 235 234 234 100.0% 184 78.6% 50 21.4%
21 Clark (D) 235 235 235 100.0% 199 84.7% 36 15.3%
1 Cook (R) 235 211 211 100.0% 210 99.5% 1 0.5%
44 Curtis (R) 235 230 230 100.0% 230 100.0% 0 0.0%
46 Daniel (R) 235 235 234 99.6% 229 97.9% 5 2.1%
5 D. Davis (D) 235 233 233 100.0% 190 81.5% 43 18.5%
50 J. Davis (R) 235 163 163 100.0% 163 100.0% 0 0.0%
33 Dunn (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 231 98.3% 4 1.7%
48 Edwards (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 232 98.7% 3 1.3%
38 Ford (D) 235 180 179 99.4% 141 78.8% 38 21.2%
23 Foushee (D) 235 232 231 99.6% 178 77.1% 53 22.9%
24 Gunn (R) 235 230 230 100.0% 229 99.6% 1 0.4%
43 Harrington (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 231 98.3% 4 1.7%
47 Hise (R) 235 230 230 100.0% 226 98.3% 4 1.7%
11 Horner (R) 235 233 233 100.0% 227 97.4% 6 2.6%
10 B. Jackson (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 233 99.1% 2 0.9%
37 J. Jackson (D) 235 227 227 100.0% 186 81.9% 41 18.1%
31 Krawiec (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 234 99.6% 1 0.4%
9 Lee (R) 235 222 222 100.0% 221 99.5% 1 0.5%
32 Lowe (D) 235 235 234 99.6% 181 77.4% 53 22.6%
25 McInnis (R) 235 233 233 100.0% 232 99.6% 1 0.4%
20 McKissick (D) 235 212 210 99.1% 169 80.5% 41 19.5%
19 Meredith (R) 235 208 208 100.0% 201 96.6% 7 3.4%
36 Newton (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 233 99.1% 2 0.9%
7 Pate (R) 235 233 233 100.0% 232 99.6% 1 0.4%
12 Rabin (R) 235 230 230 100.0% 227 98.7% 3 1.3%
8 Rabon (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 234 99.6% 1 0.4%
30 Randleman (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 231 98.3% 4 1.7%
28 Robinson (D) 235 208 208 100.0% 157 75.5% 51 24.5%
2 Sanderson (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 231 98.3% 4 1.7%
3 Smith-Ingram (D) 235 230 227 98.7% 179 78.9% 48 21.1%
41 Tarte (R) 235 196 196 100.0% 193 98.5% 3 1.5%
29 Tillman (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 233 99.1% 2 0.9%
35 Tucker (R) 235 223 220 98.7% 217 98.6% 3 1.4%
49 Van Duyn (D) 235 235 235 100.0% 183 77.9% 52 22.1%
40 Waddell (D) 235 235 235 100.0% 185 78.7% 50 21.3%
27 Wade (R) 235 201 201 100.0% 201 100.0% 0 0.0%
42 Wells (R) 235 235 235 100.0% 233 99.1% 2 0.9%
22 Woodard (D) 235 216 215 99.5% 167 77.7% 48 22.3%

Data Last Updated: May 24 2017 11:35PM

Total Votes - The total number of roll call votes taken this session on the chamber floor.
Eligible Votes - The number of votes the member was eligible to vote on this session. This number does not include votes taken when the member had an excused absence or an excused vote.
Paired Votes - The number of times an absent member paired with a member present in the chamber to cast offsetting votes.
Actual Votes - The number of actual votes the member cast on the chamber floor this session.
Vote % - The percentage of eligible votes this session on which the member voted.
With Majority - The number of times this session the member voted the same way as the outcome of the vote. If a specific vote passed and the member voted AYE, then that vote counted as WITH THE MAJORITY.
With Majority % - The With Majority votes divided by the Actual Votes.
Against Majority - The number of time this session the member voted opposite way as the outcome of the vote. If a specific vote failed and the member voted AYE, then that vote counted as AGAINST THE MAJORITY.
Against Majority % - The Against Majority votes divided by the Actual Votes.

* Presiding Officer

Speaker and Speaker Pro Tem often do not vote while presiding; therefore their voting % may be low.